A Review on Accessing to Arts Education in Primary Schools: A Case Study in Turkey

Authors

  • Ezgi Yalçın Adnan Menderes University
  • Ruken Akar Vural Adnan Menderes University

Keywords:

Art education, primary school, classroom teacher, qualitative research

Abstract

Historical process shows that, societies have evolved to different philosophies, policies and different approaches in terms of the sense of education. Today, the sense of education, which refers to the potential of human, is based on human nature, curiosity, need to know and do, and perceives individual as a whole, has been observed to become widespread. Undoubtedly, as all rivers fall into the sea, the sense of education evolving to an approach that accepts human as a whole in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor terms stands before the “exercise for the body”, “music for the soul” perception that has taken the learner and the learning process fragmentary since Plato. The main problem of the educational systems today is that they are individualist, competitive, based on over comparisons, and test-based. Inter- countries over comparisons resulted in the formation of educational programs, which are copied from each other and lack authenticity, originality, and uniqueness elements. Today, one of the learning-teaching methods that refers to the entity unity of human, and aims at developing the common faculties of human; knowing (mind), feeling (conscience and aesthetics) and doing (psychomotor) requirements together, is “drama in education”. Drama should take place in education frequently as both a subject and a method in school programs and teacher training programs. The present research evaluates classroom teachers’ perspectives of how art education is taken at primary schools, who conducts the education, the equipment of schools in accordance with student needs, and art education self-efficacy perceptions of teachers, in accordance with national and international regulations and in terms of children’s right to access art. The main purpose of the present research is studying classroom teachers’ perspectives of art education courses conducted in the province of Aydın, at schools from different socio-economic statuses. Work-group of the research consists of teachers, who teach art at twelve different primary schools in provincial centre of Aydin, Turkey. Schools were selected among low, medium and high level schools in terms of socio economic status, in accordance with purposive sampling method. Sampling method can be defined as “criterion-based sampling”. The present research employed qualitative research techniques, and tried to obtain detailed data with semi-structured interviews. According to the findings obtained in the present research, classroom teachers perceive themselves as inefficient in conducting art education classes, they have problems in implementation and with time, the schools lack equipment and for this reason they have difficulty in creating authentic working environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alakuş et al., (2014). Türkiye’de sanat eğitimini (yeniden) düşünmek. İstanbul Kültür Sanat Vakfı

Aksoy, D. (2010). İlköğretim okulu yönetici ve öğretmenlerinin sanat eğitimine bakış açılarının değerlendirilmesi.

Alter, F., Hays, T., & O’Hara, R. (2009). The challenges of implementing primary arts education: What our teachers say. Australasian Journal 22 of Early Childhood .

Altınkurt, L. (2005). Türkiye'de sanat eğitiminin gelişimi. DPÜ. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, s.125-136.

Bamford, A. (2006). The Wow Factor: Global research compendium on the impact of arts in education . Berlin, Waxmann Verlag.

Berliner,D.C. 2009. Rational response to high-stakes testing and the special case of narrowing the curriculum. Paper presented at the International Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, June 1–13, Singapore.

Boduroğlu, S. K. (2010). Türk sanat eğitiminin tarihsel gelişimi ve bauhaus ekolünün türk sanat eğitimine yansımaları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Wagner, T., Greef, A. H. D., Keenan , P., Pereira, L. (2006). Building Creative Capacities fo the 21st Century. Arts Education and Creativity. World Conference on Arts Education

Buyurgan, S., & Buyurgan, U. (2012).Sanat eğitimi ve öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Catterall, J. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education, 51(3), p.6-11.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997).Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life, Basic Books, NY.

Dewey, J. (1919).Philosophia and democracy, University of California, Chronicle, 21, p.39 54.

Dewey, J. (1934).Arts and experience, Capricorn Books, NY.

Dikici, A. (2001). Sanat eğitiminde yaratıcılık. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 149.

Eisner, E.W. (1974). Is the artists-in-the-schools program effective? Art Education, 27(2), p.19-23.

Eurydice. (2009). Avrupa'da okullarda sanat ve kültür eğitimi.

Karasar, N. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.

Kırışoğlu, O., 2002, Sanatta eğitim. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

Kaptan, S. (1991). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Tekışık Web Ofset Tesisleri.

Luftig, R. (1994). The schooled mind: Do the arts make a difference? Year 2. Oxford, OH: Center for Human Development, Learning, and Teaching, Miami University.

Mangold, S.V. (2002) Transgressing the border between protection and empowerment for domestic violence victims and older children: Empowerment as protection in the foster care system. New England School of Law. Retrieved 05/01/16.

Rauscher, F. H. , Shaw, G. L., Levine, L. J., Wright, E. L., Dennis, W. R., Newcomb, R. (1997). Music training causes long-term enhancement of preschool children’s spatial temporal reasoning abilities, Neurological Research, 19, p.1-8.

Russell, D. (2004). Arts education: Are the problems the same across five countries? Preservice teachers’ perceptions of the problems to teaching arts education in primary schools in five countries. Australian Association for Research in Education.

San, İ. (2001). Sanatlar eğitimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 30.

Sarıkaya, H. S. (2009). Sanat, eğitim ve drama/tiyatro. Eleştirel Pedagoji, p.59-64.

Saydam, H. İ. (2006).Günümüz sanat eğitimi ve sanat eğitimi içinde Prof.Dr.Hasan Pekmezci'nin yeri. Selçuk Üniversitesi / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü / Resim-İş Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalı . Konya.

Serper, Ö., & Gürsakal, N. (1989). Araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul: Bayrak Matbaacılık.

Sylvester, R. (1998). Art for brain’s sake, Educational Leadership, 56 (3), p.31-35.

Utku, Ç. (2008). İlköğretim 5.sınıf düzeyi sanat eğitiminde, müze eğitiminin öğrencilerin tutumlarına etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Resim-İş Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalı . Ankara.

Ünver, E. (2002). Sanat eğitimi.Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.

Welch, N. & Greene, A. (1995). Schools, communities and the arts: A research compendium. Tempe, AZ: Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (1999). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Additional Files

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Yalçın, E. ., & Akar Vural, R. . (2016). A Review on Accessing to Arts Education in Primary Schools: A Case Study in Turkey. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 5(3), 80–93. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/297