The Competencies of Turkish Visual Arts Teachers in Using Performance Evaluation Methods

Authors

  • Oğuz Dilmaç Ataturk University

Keywords:

Product portfolio, performance evaluation, rubric, visual arts education, evaluation methods

Abstract

This study aims to assess the competencies of visual arts teachers in using performance evaluation methods, and to examine how these competencies vary by gender, years of service, and faculty graduated from. The study is a descriptive one, aiming to depict the present situation. The sample for the study consisted of 78 visual arts teachers working in the primary schools in Turkey. A three point Likert type scale was used as the data gathering instrument of the study. For the analysis of the data and for calculations, the SPSS 13.0 statistical package was used. Frequencies and percentages were calculated. Of the parametric tests, two samples t-test and one way ANOVA were used to test for normalcy. In all statistical analyses conducted, a p<0.05 significance level was used. The reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.73. The findings indicate that visual arts teachers frequently engage in performance evaluation. Visual arts teachers state that they experience difficulties in finding time to prepare and evaluate development portfolios because classes are too crowded and with keeping these portfolios, that they do not have sufficient information on rubrics, and that they need assessment and evaluation experts to help with the use of this tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borden, S. S. (2008), Rubrics as an assessment and evaluation tool for art education. Master Thesis, Long Beach California State University.

Dorn, C. (2002, July). The Teacher As Stakeholder In Student Art Assessment And Art Program Evaluation. Art Education, 55(4).

Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu, H., (2007), Öğretmenlerin Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri Hakkındaki Yeterlik Algıları ve Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 135-145.

Huffman, E. (1998, January). Authentic rubrics. Art Education: Learning in and Through Art, 51(1), 64-68. Retrieved January 14, 2010, from the JSTOR database.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (2002). Meaningful Assessment: A Manageable and Cooperative Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Mamur, N, (2004), Çok Alanlı Sanat Eğitiminde Ölçümleme ve Değerlendirme Yaklaşımları: Bolu İli Örneği, İlköğretim- Online, 3(2), 1-18, [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr. (Access Date: 19.01.2010).

Mccollister, S. (2002, July). Developing criteria rubrics in the art classroom, 55 (4), 46-52, Retrieved January 15, 2010, from the JSTOR database.

Mehrens, W. A. (1992). Using performance assessment for accountability purposes. Educational Measurement. 11, (4) 3-9.

Piscitello, M. (2001). Using rubrics for assessment and evaluation in art. Saint Xavier University and Skylight Professional Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED453145).

Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. (2008). Teacher qualifications, Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publications,

Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, (2009), National Education Visual Arts and Sports High School Curriculum, (9,10 ve 11. Sınıflar), http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/belgeler/uc_boyutlu_sanat_atolyesi.pdf (Access Date: 14. 01. 2010).

Sezer, S. (2006). Öğrencinin akademik başarısının belirlenmesinde tamamlayıcı değerlendirme aracı olarak rubrik kullanımı üzerinde bir araştırma, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 63-71.

Shepard, M. (2005). The effect of the use of a rubric in teacher assessment. (Ph.D. Boston College). 1-181. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations.

Stevens, D., D, Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

Stokrocki, M. (2005, September-October). Reconsidering everyday assessment in the art classroom: Ceramics and science. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(1), 15-21. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ725716).

Strickland, K.& Strickland, J. (1998). Reflections on assessment, its purposes, methods, and effects on learning. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.

Tekin, H., (1991). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, Ankara: Yargı Kitap ve Yayınevi.

Additional Files

Published

2013-04-01

How to Cite

Dilmaç, O. . (2013). The Competencies of Turkish Visual Arts Teachers in Using Performance Evaluation Methods. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 2(1), 91–102. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/389