English Teachers' Professional Autonomy: An Inductive/Deductive Hybrid Thematic Analysis Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V14.N3.01

Keywords:

Professional autonomy, In-service teachers, EFL context, Hybrid thematic analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the professional autonomy of in-service English language teachers in Türkiye through an inductive–deductive hybrid thematic analysis approach. The research aims to identify the motivational, structural, and contextual factors that shape teachers’ perceptions of autonomy and their engagement in professional development. Data were collected from 117 in-service teachers via the Teachers’ Professional Autonomy Questionnaire (Okay & Balçıkanlı, 2021) and follow-up qualitative interviews with seven volunteers. Quantitative findings revealed moderately high levels of professional autonomy, with the highest scores in capability and internal motivation and the lowest in time management and external motivation. A curvilinear pattern emerged across experience levels: mid-career teachers demonstrated stronger motivation and self-efficacy, while novice and veteran teachers reported lower perceived autonomy. Qualitative findings highlighted that autonomy was fostered by intrinsic motivation, collegial collaboration, and supportive leadership, but constrained by workload, centralized curricula, and limited institutional resources. The integrated results conceptualize teachers’ autonomy as conditional professional autonomy, a dynamic balance between self-determination and systemic constraint. The study offers theoretical and practical insights for fostering teacher agency through context-sensitive professional development and participatory school leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge.

Breen, M. P., & Mann, S. J. (1997). Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 132-149). Longman.

Chaaban, Y., & Du, X. (2017). Novice teachers' job satisfaction and coping strategies: Overcoming contextual challenges at Qatari government schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 340-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.002

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to research methods. Aldine Transaction.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Arabmofrad, A., & Taghizadeh, M. (2020). Investigating the effects of English language teachers’ professional identity and autonomy in their success. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2020.52263.496

Dilekçi, Ü. (2022). Teacher autonomy as a predictor of job satisfaction. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 11(2), 328-337. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1020340

Dinçer, A. (2019). Language teacher autonomy in Turkish EFL context: Relations with teachers’ autonomy and job satisfaction levels. I-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 11-25.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Ertürk, R. (2023). The effect of teacher autonomy on teachers' professional dedication. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(2), 494-507. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.2.1048

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hughes, S., & Lewis, H. (2020). Tensions in current curriculum reform and the development of teachers’ professional autonomy. The Curriculum Journal, 31(2), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.25

Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. (2010). The democratic imagination: Envisioning schools in a changing world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3992-3

La Ganza, W. T. (2004). Learner Autonomy – teacher autonomy: Interrelating and the will to empower. In Terry, L. & Hayo, R. (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities and responses (pp. 63-79). John Benjamins.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mansfield, C., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016

McGrath, I. (2000). Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath & T.E. Lamb (Eds), Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions, (pp. 100-110). Addison Wesley Longman.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.

Morse, J. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook for qualitative research (pp.220-235). Sage Pub. Ltd.

Okay, A. (2018). The relationship among professional autonomy, reflective practice and burnout of English language instructors in Turkey (Publication No. 527513) [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. YÖK Theses Center.

Okay, A. & Balçıkanlı, C. (2021). Autonomy for ourselves: development and validation of Teachers’ Professional Autonomy Questionnaire (TEPAQ), Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(4), 513-530, https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1927681

Öztürk, G. (2019). Fostering learner autonomy among pre-service EFL teachers: A mixed-method study. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(3), 298-316.doi: 10.17583/ijep.2019.4427

Pineda, D., & Frodden, C. (2008). The development of a novice teacher’s autonomy in the context of EFL in Colombia. Profile, 9, 143-162.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.

Proudfoot, K. (2022). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0

Warren, S. (2018). Teaching experience and how it relates teacher impressions of work intensification [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Walden University.

Yıldırım, T. (2017). The perceptions of EFL instructors and administrators on teacher autonomy: A case study (Publication no. 481638) [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. YÖK Theses Center.

Yükselir, C. & Özer, Ö. (2022). Investigating the interplay between English language teachers’ autonomy, well-being and efficacy, Issues in Educational Research, 32(4), 1643-1657.

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Mutlu Gülbak, G. M., & Kırmızı, Özkan. (2025). English Teachers’ Professional Autonomy: An Inductive/Deductive Hybrid Thematic Analysis Approach. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 14(3), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V14.N3.01

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.