Factors Affecting Vocational College Instructors’ Usage of LMS in the Post-Pandemic Normal





Vocational college, Instructor, Behavioral intention, Extended UTAUT, Learning management system


The use of a learning management system (LMS) in education is becoming more and more appealing. This study aimed to look at the variables influencing Turkish vocational college instructors’ behavioral intentions (BI) in using the college’s LMS, called the Course Portal (CP), following the pandemic. The LMS factors of self-efficacy (SE), area of scientific expertise (ASE), and interactivity (INT) are used in this extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. A total of 105 instructors completed an online questionnaire. The regression model and artificial neural network approaches were used to analyze the data. The findings demonstrated that the instructors’ BI in using the CP could be anticipated from the SE and instructors’ ASE, and the instructors’ behavior in the use of the CP could be anticipated from facilitating conditions (FC), INT, and the BI to use it. Performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), and social influence (SI) were ultimately excluded from the final model due to their insignificant connections with BI. It is suggested that instructors’ BI to use the CP will be high if their scientific expertise coincides with the e-learning and that instructors’ BI to use e-learning will also grow, in their opinion, as their SE increases. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to conclude that instructors’ BI, including the availability of FCs and an interactive LMS, will boost their overall use of LMS.


Download data is not yet available.


Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use:An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306-1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R. e., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19 [Original Research]. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470

Baki, R., Birgoren, B., & Aktepe, A. (2018). A meta analysis of factors affecting perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the adoption of e-learning systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19, 4-42. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.471649

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Chandra, Y. (2021). Online education during COVID-19: perception of academic stress and emotional intelligence coping strategies among college students. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0097

Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018). Student continuance of learning management system use: A longitudinal exploration. Computers & Education, 120, 241-253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research (Vol. 27). Addison-Wesley.

Greenwood, D. (1991). An overview of neural networks. Behavioral Science, 36(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830360102

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.

Han, Y., & Wang, B. (2011). Investigation of listed companies credit risk assessment based on different learning schemes of BP neural network. International Journal of Business and Management, 6. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n2p204

Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440

Haykin, S. S. (1999). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall.

Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Sese, F. J., & Urquizu, P. (2011). The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2224-2232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.001

Hippert, H. S., Pedreira, C. E., & Souza, R. C. (2001). Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: a review and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.910780

Hsia, J.-W., Chang, C.-C., & Tseng, A.-H. (2012). Effects of indiviuals' locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour & Information Technology - Behaviour & IT, 33, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.702284

Islam, A. K. M. N. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context. Computers & Education, 69, 387-399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.037

Khechine, H., & Lakhal, S. (2018). Technology as a double-edged sword: From behavior prediction with UTAUT to students’ outcomes considering personal characteristics. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 063-102. https://doi.org/10.28945/4022

Khechine, H., Raymond, B., & Augier, M. (2020). The adoption of a social learning system: Intrinsic value in the UTAUT model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2306-2325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12905

Lahrash, H., Elmansori, M., & Salama, M. (2021). Prior research on the adoption of e-learning and UTAUT2 model: Critical analysis. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 18, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.18.1.17857

Lavidas, K., Komis, V., & Achriani, A. (2022). Explaining faculty members’ behavioral intention to use learning management systems. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00217-5

McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers & Education, 52(2), 496-508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2011). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (4th Ed.). Taylor & Francis.

Mtebe, J., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and instructors' intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 249-271. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1687

Nguyen, N.-T. (2021). A study on satisfaction of users towards learning management system at International University – Vietnam National University HCMC. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 186-196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.02.001

Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education.

Petrini, J., Dias, R., Pertile, S., Eler, J., Ferraz, J., & Mourão, G. (2012). Degree of multicollinearity and variables involved in linear dependence in additive‑dominant models. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 4712, 1743-1750. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012001200010

Razkane, H., Sayeh, A. Y., & Yeou, M. (2022). University teachers’ attitudes towards distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Hurdles, challenges, and take-away lessons. 3. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11436

Robinson, C., & Schumacker, R. (2009). Interaction effects: Centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35.

Rutledge, D. N., & Barros, A. S. (2002). Durbin–Watson statistic as a morphological estimator of information content. Analytica Chimica Acta, 454(2), 277-295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01555-0

Scott, J. E., & Walczak, S. (2009). Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Information & Management, 46(4), 221-232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.10.003

Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004

Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 35(3), 553-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042796

Simoncini, A., Tagliaferri, V., Trovalusci, F., & Ucciardello, N. (2017). Neural networks approach for IR-heating and deformation of ABS in thermoforming. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 56, 114. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2017.087333

Sinclair, J., & Aho, A.-M. (2018). Experts on super innovators: understanding staff adoption of learning management systems. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609

Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: Differences in UTAUT determinants between pre- and post-adopters. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 602-620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037

Tabachnick, B. G., Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.

Taiwo, A., & Downe, A. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49, 48-58.

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008

Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: an integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003714632

Teo, T., Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Lemay, D. J. (2019). Exploring the drivers of technology acceptance: a study of Nepali school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 495-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09654-7

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428

Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: U.S. vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13, 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856507

Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90017-4

Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088

Wrycza, S., & Kuciapski, M. (2018, 2018//). Determinants of academic e-learning systems acceptance. information systems: Research, development, applications, education, Cham.

Zacharis, G., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Factors predicting University students’ behavioral intention to use eLearning platforms in the post-pandemic normal: an UTAUT2 approach with ‘learning value’. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2

Zhang, G., Eddy Patuwo, B., & Y. Hu, M. (1998). Forecasting with artificial neural networks:: The state of the art. International Journal of Forecasting, 14(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7

Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Doll, W., Deng, X., & Williams, M. (2018). The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436590

Additional Files



How to Cite

Özkan, U. B., Çiğdem, H. ., & Yarar, G. (2023). Factors Affecting Vocational College Instructors’ Usage of LMS in the Post-Pandemic Normal . Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 12(1), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V12.N1.14