Teachers’ Informal Learning in The Context of Development: Resources, Barriers, And Motivation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N2.05

Keywords:

informal learning, professional development, learning resources, learning motivation, teaching profession

Abstract

This research focuses on teachers’ professional learning. In this context, the purpose of the research is to determine the informal learning resources, motivations and barriers in the learning process from the teachers’ perspective. In the research, one of the qualitative methods, basic qualitative research design was used. Participants of the study consisted of 21 teachers who were determined with maximum diversity sampling. Research data were collected through face-to-face interviews with the participants. The semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers was used in the interviews. The data obtained as a result of the interviews were transferred to the computer program and analyzed by content analysis method. Three themes were determined as a result of the analysis. These are informal learning resources, learning motivation and professional learning barriers. Teachers’ informal learning resources are divided into two sub-themes as interactive and personal, while learning motivation is divided into two subthemes as intrinsic and extrinsic sources of motivation. The barriers to the learning process are divided into four sub-themes. These are personal barriers, school-related barriers, workrelated barriers, and barriers caused by central policies. Since teachers have different kinds of learning methods, creating the sources that support these methods, linking the teachers’ professional developments with their career progressions and averting the dilemmas caused by work and family perceptions and transforming the schools into learning environments are the main suggestions made as a result of the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kazım Çelik

Full Professor
Education Faculty Pamukkale Üniversity Turkey
E-mail: kcelik@pau.edu.tr
ORCID: 0000-0001-7319-6567

Osman Tayyar Çelik

Assistant Professor
Faculty of Health Sciences
Inonu University
Turkey
E-mail: otayyar44@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0003-3951-7261

Ümit Kahraman

Assistant Professor
Faculty of Health Sciences
Bilecik Seyh Edebali University
Turkey
Email: drumitkahraman@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0002-4547-6753

References

Akiba, Motoko. “Professional learning activities in context: A statewide survey of middle school mathematics teachers.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 20. (14) (2012): 1-36. Appova, Aina and Fraine Arbaugh. “Teachers’ motivation to learn: implications for supporting professional growth.” Professional Development in Education 44. (2018): 5-21.

Avidov-Ungar, Orit. “A model of professional development: Teachers’ perceptions of their professional development.” Teachers and Teaching 22. (2016): 653-669.

Ayvacı, Hakan Şevki, Bakırcı, Hasan and Yıldız, Mehmet. “Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri ve beklentileri.” Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 3. 2 (2014): 357-383.

Bayar, Adem. “The components of effective professional development activities in terms of teachers’ perspective.” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 6. (2014): 319-327. Bektaş, Fatih., Ali Çağatay Kılınç and Sedat Gümüş. The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning:

mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies (2020)

Bellibas, Mehmet Sukru, and Emine Gumus. “Teachers’ perceptions of the quantity and quality of professional development activities in Turkey.” Cogent Education 3. 1 (2016): 1–15.

Bigsby, James B., and William A. Firestone. “Why teachers participate in professional development: Lessons from a schoolwide teacher study group.” The New Educator 13. 1 (2017): 72-93.

Buczynski, Sandy and C Bobbi Hansen. “Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26. (2010): 599-607.

Camburn, Eric M., and Seong Won Han. “Teachers’ professional learning experiences and their engagement in reflective practice: A replication study.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 28. 4 (2017): 527-554.

Can, Ertuğ. “Öğretmenlerin meslekî gelişimleri: Engeller ve öneriler.” Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 7. (2019): 16181650.

Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage Publications, 2016.

Creswell, John W., and Dana L. Miller. “Determining validity in qualitative inquiry.” Theory into practice 39.3 (2000): 124-130. Donitsa-Schmidt, Smadar and Ruth Zuzovsky. “The effect of formal, nonformal and informal learning on teachers’ promotion to middle leadership roles in schools.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 23. (2020): 371-387.

Eraut, Michael. “Informal learning in the workplace.” Studies in Continuing Education 26. 2 (2004): 247-273.

Eroğlu, Mehmet, and Ramazan Özbek. “Zümre öğretmenler kurulu toplantılarının mesleki gelişim bağlamında incelenmesi.” Researcher: Social Science Studies 6. 3 (2018): 255-271.

Gorozidis, Georgios, and Athanasios G. Papaioannou. “Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations.” Teaching and Teacher Education 39. (2014): 1-11.

Gürkan, Burcu, Semra Tican Başaran, and Şener Büyüköztürk. “Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi.” Eğitime Bakış Dergisi 14. 43 (2018): 17-25.

Hoekstra, Annemarieke. “Experienced Teachers’ Informal Learning in the Workplace. IVLOS Series.” Online Submission (2007).

Hoekstra, Annemarieke, Mieke Brekelmans, Douwe Beijaard and Fred Korthagen “Experienced teachers’ informal learning: Learning activities and changes in behavior and cognition.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25. 5 (2009): 663-673.

Hoekstra, Annemarieke, and Fred Korthagen. “Teacher learning in a context of educational change: Informal learning versus systematically supported learning.” Journal of teacher Education 62. 1 (2011): 76-92.

İlğan, Abdurrahman. Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi ve denetimi: Öğrenen öğretmenler, başaran öğrenciler. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 2012.

in de Wal, Joost Jansen, Perry J.den Brok, Janneke G.Hooijer, Rob L.Martens, Antoinevan den Beemt. “Teachers’ engagement in professional learning: Exploring motivational profiles.” Learning and Individual Differences 36 (2014): 27-36.

Jeong, Shinhee, Soo Jeoung Han, Jin Lee, Suravee Sunalai and Seung Won Yoon. “Integrative literature review on informal learning: antecedents, conceptualizations, and future directions.” Human Resource Development Review 17. 2 (2018): 128-152.

Kedzior, Margaret and Steve Fifield. “Teacher professional development.” Education Policy Brief (2004): 1-6.

Kubat, Ulaş. “Fen bilimleri öğretim programına yönelik öğretmenlere verilen hizmet içi eğitimin öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi.” Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 4. 2 (2018): 1-8.

Kwakman, Kitty. “Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19. 2 (2003): 149-170.

Kyndt, Eva, Filip Dochy, and Hanne Nijs. “Learning conditions for non‐formal and informal workplace learning.” Journal of Workplace Learning 21. 5 (2009): 369-383.

Kyndt, Eva, et al. “Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes.” Review of Educational Research 86. 4 (2016): 1111-1150.

Labone, Elizabeth, and Janette Long. “Features of effective professional learning: A case study of the implementation of a system-based professional learning model.” Professional Development in Education 42. 1 (2016): 54-77.

Lecat, Antoine, Simon Beausaert, and Isabel Raemdonck. “On the relation between teachers’(in) formal learning and innovative working behavior: the mediating role of employability.” Vocations and Learning 11.3 (2018): 529-554.

Levenberg, Ariella, and Avner Caspi. “Comparing perceived formal and informal learning in face-to-face versus online environments.” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 6. 1 (2010): 323-333.

Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage Publications, 1985.

Livingstone, David W. “Adults’ informal learning: Definition, findings, gaps and future research.” Centre for the Study of Education and Work, Toronto (2001)

Lohman, Margaret C., and Nicholas H. Woolf. “Self-initiated learning activities of experienced public school teachers: Methods, sources, and relevant organizational influences.” Teachers and Teaching 7. 1 (2001): 59-74.

Lohman, Margaret C. “A survey of factors influencing the engagement of two professional groups in informal workplace learning activities.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 16.4 (2005): 501-527.

Lohman, Margaret C. “Factors influencing teachers’ engagement in informal learning activities.” Journal of Workplace Learning 18. 3 (2006):141-156.

Louws, Monika L., et al. “Teachers’ self-directed learning and teaching experience: What, how, and why teachers want to learn.” Teaching and Teacher Education 66. (2017): 171-183.

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri Örgün Eğitim 2019-2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020, from https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=396.

Meirink, Jacobiene A., Paulien C. Meijer, and Nico Verloop. “A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13.2 (2007): 145-164.

Merriam, Sharan B. Qualititive research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009. Merriam, Sharan. B. Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. (Çeviri Ed.: S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2013

Miles, Matthew. B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis (3rd Edition). California: Sage Publications, 2014.

OECD. TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing, 2019.

Opfer, V. Darleen, David G. Pedder, and Zsolt Lavicza. “The role of teachers’ orientation to learning in professional development and change: A national study of teachers in England.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27.2 (2011): 443-453.

Özdemir, Murat. “Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalişma.” Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11.1 (2010): 323-343.

Özer Özkan, Yeşim, and Duygu Anıl. Öğretmen mesleki gelişim değişkenlerinin ayırt edicilik düzeyi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 29.4 (2014): 205-216.

Özgenel, Mustafa. “Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerine ilişkin fenomenolojik bir araştırma.” Akademik Platform Eğitim ve Değişim Dergisi 2.2 (2019): 128-143.

Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.” American Psychologist 55.1 (2000): 68.

Schugurensky, Daniel. “The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field.” New Approaches for Lifelong

Learning (NALL) Fourth Annual Conference, October 6-8, 2000, https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/2733/2/ 19formsofinformal.pdf

Scribner, Jay Paredes. “Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning.” Educational Administration Quarterly 35.2 (1999): 238-266.

Scribner, Jay Paredes. “Teacher learning in context: The special case of rural high school teachers.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 11 (2003): 12.

Shirrell, Matthew, Megan Hopkins, and James P. Spillane. “Educational infrastructure, professional learning, and changes in teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs.” Professional Development in Education 45.4 (2019): 599-613.

Sıcak, Ali. & Ramazan Şükrü Parmaksız. “İlköğretim kurumlarındaki mesleki çalışmaların etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi.” İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 17.1 (2016): 17-33.

Silverman, David. Interprenting qualitative data. California: Sage Publications, 2014.

Thomson, Margareta Maria, and Jeannine Turner. “Teaching motivations, characteristics and professional growth: Results from the Great Expectations (GE) programme in the United States.” Educational Psychology 35.5 (2015): 578-597.

Uçar, Rezzan., and Cemalettin İpek. “İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin MEB hizmet içi eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri.” Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 3.1 (2006): 34-53.

Uştu, Hasan, Ayşe Mentiş Taş and, Binali Sever. “Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişime yönelik algılarına ilişkin nitel bir araştırma.” Elektronik Mesleki Gelişim ve Araştırma Dergisi 4.1 (2016): 15-23.

Watkins, Karen E., and Victoria J. Marsick. “Towards a theory of informal and incidental learning in organizations.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 11.4 (1992): 287-300.

Wei, Ruth Chung, Linda Darling-Hamond, Alethea Andree, Nikole Richardson and Stelios Orphanos. “Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the US and Abroad. Technical Report.” National Staff Development Council (2009).

Yalçın İncik Eylem and, Sinem Evin Akbay. “Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerine yönelik bir çalışma: mesleki gelişim faaliyetlerine yönelik tutumları ve eğitim ihtiyaçları.” Electronic Turkish Studies 13.27 (2018):1653-1676.

Yaylacı, A. Faruk. “Öğretmenlerin kendilerini geliştirmelerine ilişkin yaklaşım sorunu.” Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6. ÖYGE Özel Sayısı (2013): 25-40.

Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2013.

Yoon, Kwang Suk, Teresa Duncan, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Beth Scarloss and, & Kathy L. Shapley. “Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. issues & answers. rel 2007-no. 033.” Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1) (2007).

Additional Files

Published

2021-08-02

How to Cite

Çelik, K., Çelik, O. T., & Kahraman, Ümit. (2021). Teachers’ Informal Learning in The Context of Development: Resources, Barriers, And Motivation. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N2.05