Student Attitudes in Inclusive Settings: Public Middle Schools
Keywords:
Student attitudes, students in general education, students with learning disabilitiesAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of inclusive education on the general education population of middle school students’ attitudes. Therefore, a quantitative study was designed as a quasi-experimental study to measure such attitudes. The study included non- random samples of one control group (non-inclusive) and one experimental group (inclusive). This study took place in a middle school in a large urban school district in the US. The participants of this study included 20 students without disabilities in each classroom with a total number of 120 students from a total of six different middle school classrooms. The study included two classrooms (one inclusive and one non-inclusive) for each grade level (6, 7, and 8). About 60% of these students were Hispanic, 50% were male, and 80% received free or reduced lunch. In addition, ages ranged from 11 to 15 years. Inclusion Survey for Middle School Students (ISMSS), which included 30 questions was used to measure the attitudes of students without disabilities towards students with learning disabilities. SPSS was used for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The findings of this study indicated that inclusive education had a negative effect on the attitudes of students without disabilities towards their peers with disabilities in public middle school classrooms.Downloads
References
Agne, K. (1999). Kill the baby: Making all things equal, Educational Horizons, 77 (3), 140- 147.
Aragon, L. J. (2007). Inclusion of students with and without disabilities in two educational settings: The perceptions of the nondisabled students of this experience. Retrieved from ProQuest database. (AAT 304714283).
Baker, E. T., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 33-35.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Downing, J. E., & Peckham-Hardin, K. D. (2007). Inclusive education: What makes it a good education for students with moderate to severe disabilities? Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(1), 16-30.
Downing, J. E., Spencer, S., & Cavallaro, C. (2004). The development of an inclusive charter elementary school: Lessons learned. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29(1), 11-24.
Dunn, C., Chambers, D., & Rabren, K. (2004). Variables affecting students’ decisions to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 314–323.
Ferguson, D. L., Hanreddy, A., & Draxton, S. (2011). Giving students voice as a strategy for improving teacher practice. London Review of Education, 9(1), 55-70.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Grusec, J. E. (1992). Social learning theory and developmental psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 776-786.
Kalambouka, A., Farrell, P., Dyson, A., & Kaplan, I. (2007). The impact of placing pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools on the achievement of their peers. Educational Research, 49(4), 365-382.
Kortering, L., & Braziel, P. (2002). A look at high school programs as perceived by youth with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 177-188.
Marchant, G. J. (1990). Faculty questionnares: A useful resource of LD support services. Interventions in School and Clinic, 26(2), 106-109.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., & Connors, N. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes test. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130-137.
McBrien, J. L., & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to educational terms. Alexandria, VA; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Peetsma, M. Y., Roeleveld, J., & Karsten, S. (2001). Inclusion in education: Comparing pupils’ development in special and regular education. Educational Review, 53(2), 125-135.
Siperstein, G. N., Parker, R. C., Bardon, J. N., & Widaman, K. F. (2007). A national study of youth attitudes toward the inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 435-455.
Smoot, S. L. (2004). An outcome measure for the social goals of inclusion. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23(3), 6-13.
Smoot, S. L. (2011). An outcome measure for social goals of inclusion. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(1), 6-13.
U.S. Department of Education. Office of Special Education Programs. (2003). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2006). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/arc_toc8.asp#partbCC.
Wagner, M. C. (1991). Dropouts with disabilities: What do we know? What can we do? Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Wagner, M. C. (2005). The early post-high school years for youth with disabilities. In M.
Wagner, L. Newman, R. Cameto, N. Garza, & P. Levine (Eds.), After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Menlo Park CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/pdfs/afterhighschool_report.pdf
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
