The Effect of Differentiating Instruction Using Multiple Intelligences on Achievement in and Attitudes towards Science in Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities

Authors

  • Omema Mostafa Kamel Gomaa Cairo University

Keywords:

differentiated instruction, multiple intelligences, achievement, attitudes, Science, learning disabilities

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of using differentiated instruction using multiple intelligences on achievement in and attitudes towards science in middle school students with learning disabilities. A total of 61 students identified with LD participated. The sample was randomly divided into two groups; experimental (n= 31 boys)and control (n= 30 boys). An experimental Pretest-Posttest Control-Group design was used in this study. Findings from this study indicated the effectiveness of differentiated instruction using multiple intelligences on improving achievement in and attitudes towards science in the target students. On the basis of the findings, the study advocated for the effectiveness of using differentiated instruction using multiple intelligences on improving achievement in and attitudes towards science in learning disabled students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school’s story .Journal of Advanced Academics, 3(19), 502- 530.

Bybee, R. (1993).An instructional model for science education. In Developing Biological Literacy . Colorado Spring, CO: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.

Chapman, C., & King, R. (2009). Differentiated instructional strategies for reading in the content areas (2nd ed) .Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Collette, A.T. & Chiappetta, E.L. (1994). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools (3rd ed.) New York: Merrill.

Gardner, H. (2003, April) .Multiple intelligences after twenty years .Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards- based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34-63. Retrieved from ERIC database.

Lazer, D. (2004). Higher-order thinking the multiple intelligence way. Chicago, IL: Zephyr Press.

Levy, R (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. [Electronic version]. Clearing House, 81(4), 161-164.

Mourad Ali ( 2007) .How the reading disabled brain learns .Alexandria ,Dar El Wafaa .

Mourad A. Eissa & Amal A. Mostafa(2013). The effects of differentiated instruction by integrating multiple intelligences and learning styles on solving problems , achievement in, and attitudes towards math in six graders with learning disabilities in cooperative groups. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, Issue(3), No.(3) ,pp. 32- 44.

Mourad Ali , Waleed El sayed , Ahmed Gomaa ( 2006).Computer and learning disabilities , theory and practice .Alexandria , Dar El Wafaa .

Nielsen, D., Winter, L., Keetle, S., & Jackson, C. (2007). More than a reading intervention: Teachers working together to improve the reading achievement of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds .Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners . 10(1/2)125- 146 .

Sanfeliz, M., & Stalzer, M., (2003), Science Motivation in the Multicultural classroom, The Science Teacher, 64-66.

Servilio, K. (2009). You get to choose! Motivating students to read through differentiated instruction. [Electronic version]. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 5(5), 2-1l.

VanSciver,1.(2005). Motherhood, apple pie, and differentiated instruction. [Electronic version]. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(7), 534-535.

Additional Files

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Kamel Gomaa, O. M. (2014). The Effect of Differentiating Instruction Using Multiple Intelligences on Achievement in and Attitudes towards Science in Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 3(3), 110–118. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/351