Resource Room Implementation in a Secondary School and On-the-Job Training of Teachers

Authors

  • Latife Özaydın Hasan Kalyoncu University
  • Nilay Kayhan Hasan Kalyoncu University
  • Merih Toker Hasan Kalyoncu University
  • Sevim Karahan Hasan Kalyoncu University

Keywords:

Resource room, mainstreaming, secondary school, on-the-job training, action research

Abstract

Various studies conducted into mainstreaming implementations in preschool and primary school but implementations in light of data are rare in the secondary schools. To provide valuable insights to this gap in the literature, the present study was conducted to identify the requirements in resource room implementations in a secondary school and demonstrate the contributions of the actions produced to improve the needs that were determined. The research was conducted as an action research. 12 mainstreaming students in 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade, 20 field teachers, three counselors, researchers and field specialists took part in the study. Data were collected using qualitative methods; interviews, observation, researcher notes, and documents. The data were analyzed with descriptive and content analysis. The research findings are explained under the following headings: needs assessment, preparation/implementation of the action plan and assessment after implementation. Our findings revealed that teachers had limited knowledge of teaching methods and on the implementation of teaching; they had high expectations from the students and because of the intensive curriculum, time was an important problem for the teachers. To meet the identified needs, an action plan that included the organization of RR and the on-the-job training of the teachers was prepared. During the implementation phase, a cyclical process of innovation and changes were followed. Following the implementation, the teachers and counselors evaluated the on-the-job training as being different from traditional in-service training and as an innovative education process that increased teacher-student motivation and participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Zoubi, S. M., & Bani Abdel R. (2016). Mainstreaming in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Obstacles facing learning disabilities resource room. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(1), 37-55.

Akay, E., Uzuner, Y., & Girgin, Ü. (2014). Kaynaştırmadaki işitme engelli öğrencilerle gerçekleştirilen destek eğitim odası uygulamasındaki sorunlar ve çözüm gayretleri. [The problems and solution efforts of the resource room application designed for the mainstreamed primary school aged hearing impaired students]. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 43-68. Retrieved on 5.4.2017 from http://www.enadonline.com, 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.3s3m.

Aron, L., & Loprest, P. (2012). Disability and the education system. Future Child, 22(1), 97- 122.

Batu, S. (2000). Kaynaştırma, destek hizmetler ve kaynaştırmaya hazırlık etkinlikleri. [Mainstreaming, support services and mainstreaming preparation activities]. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 2(4), 35-45.

Billingsley, B. S. (2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature. The Journal of Special Educational, 38(1), 39-55.

Bogdan, C. R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education. Boston: MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Boyer, L., & Mainzer, R.W. (2003). Who's teaching students with disabilities? A profile of characteristics, licensure status, and feelings of preparedness. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 8-11

CEC (2009). What every special educator must know: The international standards for the preparation and certification of special education teachers. Sixth edition, revised. Council Exceptional Children 1110 N. Glebe Road, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22201.

Çolak, A. (2007). Kaynaştırma uygulanan bir ilköğretim sınıfındaki sosyal yeterlik özelliklerinin betimlenmesi ve iyileştirilmesi çalışmaları. [An investigation of description and intervention efforts of social competence characteristics of a mainstreamed primary classroom]. (Unpublished Doctor’s Thesis). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.

Dekeyser, H. M., Van Rijn, F. H. M., & Jansen, D. (2005). Teacher training on the job. Information and Communication Technologies and Real-Life Learning, 182, 179- 188.

DeSimone, J. R., & Parmar, R. S. (2006). Issues and challenges for middle school mathematics teachers in inclusion classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 106(8), 338- 346.

Dewey, J., Sindelar, P. T., Bettini, E., Boe, E. E., Rosenberg, M.S., & Leko, C. (2017). Explaining the decline special education teacher employment from 2005-2012. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 315-329.

Hodgson, J.R., Lazarus, S.S., & Thurlow, M.L. (2011). Professional development to improve accommodations decisions. A review of the literature. (Synthesis Report 84). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–236. (Abstract)

Karge, B. D., Mc Clure, M., & Patton, P. L. (1995). The success of collaboration resource programs for students with disabilities in grades 6 through 8. Remedial and Special Education, 16(2), 79-89.

Katz, J. (2013). The three-block model of universal design for learning implementation in a high school. Canadian Journal of Education, 141(1), 153–194.

Kayhan, N. (2016). Birlikte öğretim yaklaşımlarından bir öğretim yapan bir gözlemci modelinin kaynaştırma ortamlarındaki sınıf öğretmenlerinin etkili öğretim becerilerine etkisi. [The impact of the effectiveness of an observer model providing education according to the 'joint teaching' approach in an inclusive environment on the effective teaching ability of classroom teachers]. (Unpublished Doctor’s Thesis). Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Leinhardt, G., & Pallay, A. (1982). Restrictive educational settings: Exile or haven? Review of Educational Research, 52(4), 557–578.

Mackey, M. (2014). Inclusive education in the United States: Middle school general education teachers’ approaches to inclusion. International Journal of Instruction, 7(2), 5-20

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Graetz, J. E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 103-116.

Mastropieri,M.A., Scruggs,T.E., Norland, J.J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E.H., & Connors, N. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130-137.

McLeskey, J., Tyler, N. C., & Flippin, S. S. (2004). The supply and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 5-21.

McLeskey, J., Waldron, N. L., & Redd, L. (2014). A case study of a highly effective, inclusive elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 48(1) 59–70.

McNamara, B. E. (1989). The resource room: A guide for special educators. State University of New York Press. E-book ISBN: 9780585075242.

Messinger-Willman, J., & Marino, M. T. (2010) Universal Design for Learning and Assistive Technology: Leadership Considerations for Promoting Inclusive Education in Today’s Secondary Schools. NASSP Bulletin 94(1), 5–16. SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.1177/0192636510371977.

MEB (2005). Eğitim ve Öğretim Çalişmalarinin Plânli Yürütülmesine İlişkin Yönerge. [Planned Execution of Education and Training Studies]. Tebliğler Dergisi Ağustos, 2005/2575 TD.

MEB (2008). Kaynaştırma yoluyla Eğitim Uygulamaları, Genelge No: 2008 / 60. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı, [Education practices through mainstreaming]. Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.

MEB (2010). İlköğretim okullarındaki kaynaştırma uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi, [Evaluating the inclusion practices applied in the primary schools]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Eğitimi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.

MEB (2012). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. [Special Education Services Regulation]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Ankara.

MEB (2016). Destek Eğitim Odası Kılavuz Kitapçığı. Özel Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü, Retrieved on 5.08.2017 from: http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_08/03045051_destek_egitim_odasi_ki lavuz.pdf

Messinger-Willman. J., & Marino, M. T. (2010). Universal design for learning and assistive technology: Leadership considerations for promoting inclusive education in Today’s secondary schools. NASSP Bulletin, 94(1), 5–16.

Montgomery, A., & Mirenda, P. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, sentiments, attitudes, and concerns about the inclusion of students with developmental disabilities. Exceptionality Education International, 24, 18-32.

Myers, S. (2016). The transfer of self-regulation and self-monitoring from the resource room to the science classroom. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Otterbein University.

Özaydın, L., & Çolak, A. (2011). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin kaynaştırma eğitimine ve okul öncesi eğitimde kaynaştırma eğitimi hizmet içi eğitim programına ilişkin görüşleri. [The views of preschool education teachers over mainstreaming education and over in- service education program of mainstreaming education at preschool education]. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 189-226.

Özaydın, L, Tekin-İftar, E., & Kaner, S. (2008). Arkadaşlık Becerilerini Geliştirme Programının Özel Gereksinimi Olan Okul Öncesi Çocuklarının Sosyal Etkileşimlerine Etkisi. [The effects of a friendship development program on the social interactions of the preschool children with special needs]. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 9(1), 15-32.

Özdemir, İ. (2003). Öğretmenlerin iş başında yetistirilmesinde okul yöneticisinin rolü. [The principal's role in training teachers on the job]. Educational Administration in Theory & Practice, 35, 448-465.

Pandey, S. C. & Patnaik, S. (2014). Establishing reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry: A critical examination. Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies, 12(1), 5743-5753.

Rea, P. J., McLaughlin, V.L., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Council for Exceptional Children, 68(2), 203-222.

Santangelo, T. (2014). Why is writing so difficult for students with learning disabilities? A narrative review to inform the design of effective instruction learning disabilities: A Contemporary Journal 12(1), 5-20, 2014.

Santoli, S. P., Sachs, J., Romey, E. A., & McClurg, S. (2008). A successful formula for middle school inclusion: Collaboration, time, and administrative support. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 32(2), 1-13, DOI: 10.1080/19404476.2008.11462055

Santangelo, T. (2014). Why is writing so difficult for students with learning disabilities? A narrative review to inform the design of effective instruction. Learning disabilities: A Contemporary Journal 12(1), 5-20.

Schepis, M.M., Reid, D.H., Ownbey, J., & Parsons, M. B. (2001). Training support staff to embed teaching with in natural routines of young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(3), 313-327.

Talas, S., Kaya, F., Yıldırım, N., Yazıcı, L., Nural, H., Çelebi, İ., Keskin, Ş., Söylemez, T., & Nugay, E. (2016). Destek eğitim odaları ve öğretmenler üzerine betimsel bir çalışma: Tokat ili örneği. [A descriptive study on resource room and teachers: Tokat sample]. Journal of European Education, 6(3), 31-52.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

TOHUM / ERG, (2011a). Policy and practice recommendation project to increase the effectiveness of mainstreaming/inclusion, the situation regarding mainstreaming/inclusion in Turkey. February, 2011. Retrieved on 3.04.2017from http://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/03/Turkiyede_Kaynastirma_Butunlestirme_Yoluyla_Egitimin_ Durumu.pdf

TOHUM / ERG, (2011b). Policy and practice recommendation project to increase the effectiveness of mainstreaming/inclusion, Good examples on mainstreaming/inclusion education from the world and Turkey. October, 2011. Retrieved on 10.02.2017 from http://tohumotizm.org.tr/sites/default/files/kcfinder/files/4.pdf

UNESCO (1994). Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education, United Nations resolution adopted by the world conference on special Needs Education: Access and Quality. Retrieved on 11.03.2017 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/000984/098427eo.pdf.

UNESCO (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Retrieved on 6.8.2017 from http:/ creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/

UNICEF (2014). Access to school and the learning environment II-Universal design for learning. Retrieved on 6.08.2017 from education.org/sites/default/files/uploads/booklets/IE_Webinar_Booklet_11pdf

Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal; 46(1), 275-314.

Uzuner, Y. (2005). Özel eğitimden örneklerle eylem araştırmaları. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 6(2), 1-12.

Ünay, E. (2015). Destek oda eğitiminin kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin matematik başarıları üzerine etkisi. [The effects of the resource room instruction on mainstream students’ achievement in mathematics]. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 38-49.

Vaughn, S., & Klingner, J. K. (1998). Students' perceptions of inclusion and resource room settings. The Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 79-88.

Vuran, S., & Olcay Gül, S. (2012). On-the-job training of special education staff: Teaching the simultaneous prompting strategies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(3), 2101-2110.

Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., & Levine, P. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). (NCSER 2006-3000). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Walker, B., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., Houchins, D. E., & Cihak, D. F. (2005). Using the expressive writing program to improve the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 175–183.

Watson, S. M. R., Gable, R. A., & Morin, L. L. (2016). The role of executive functions in classroom instruction of students with learning disabilities. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 3(167), 1-5. doi:10.4172/2469-9837.1000167.

Watson, S. (2017). Introduction to special education resource rooms. Retrieved on 12.06.2017 from https://www.thoughtco.com/special-education-resource-room-3110962.

Yıldırım, A. (2011). Öğretmen eğitiminde çatışma alanları ve yeniden yapılanma. [Competing agendas and reform in teacher education]. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(1), 1-17.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. (9. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yılmaz, E., & Batu, E. (2016). Farklı branştan ilkokul öğretmenlerinin bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programı, yasal düzenlemeler ve kaynaştırma uygulamaları hakkındaki görüşleri. [Opinions of primary school teachers about individualized education programme, legal regulation and inclusion implementation]. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 17(03), 247-268.

Additional Files

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

Özaydın, L. ., Kayhan, N. ., Toker, M., & Karahan, S. . (2017). Resource Room Implementation in a Secondary School and On-the-Job Training of Teachers. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 6(2), 111–136. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/280