Determination of Prospective Chemistry Teachers’ Opinions and Information Levels on Laboratory Safety

Authors

  • Hülya Demircioğlu Karadeniz Technical University
  • Gökhan Demircioğlu Karadeniz Technical University

Keywords:

Laboratory safety, laboratory warning and safety sign, prospective chemistry teachers

Abstract

Activities carried out in the laboratory provide important contributions to students in terms of developing their research, problem solving, questioning, using hand skills and communication skills. However, providing safety during the studies in the laboratory environment is extremely important. The aim of this study is to determine information level and ideas of prospective chemistry teachers on laboratory safety. Descriptive method is used in study. The sample of the research consists of 58 participants who are studying in Chemistry Teaching department. Questionnaires and informal observations were used as data collection tools. From point of view of the obtained data, scores of the students in different grades in questionnaires were compared with ANOVA. A statistically significant difference was found between the scores obtained from the questionnaire (F(3,57)=10,568; p<0,05). Independent sample t test was applied to the data to determine whether the scores obtained from the questionnaire differed in terms of gender variable. According to the gender variable, there was no statistically significant difference between the scores obtained from the questionnaire (t=0,231, p>0,05). The questionnaire results show that prospective chemistry teacher are aware of the importance of safety issues, however, the results of informal observation showed that candidates did not work in the fume cupboard when working with some volatile substances, they poured all the chemical wastes into sinks and did not check the warning signs on the tubes. For this reason, it is suggested to give information about the safety in the laboratory lessons, sometimes to remind them and to spare time to give safety information in the theoretical lessons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, M., Zakaria, A. M., Balkhyour, M. A. and Kashif, M. (2016). Chemical safety inacademic laboratories: an exploratory factor analysis of safe work practices & facilitiesin a university. Journal of Safety Studies, 2(1), 1-14.

Anılan, B. (2010). The recognition level of the students of science education about the hazard symbols of chemicals (Case of ESOGU, Eskisehir). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4092–4097.

Bayrak, Ç. & Ağaoğlu, E. (1999). Fen öğretiminde laboratuvar güvenliği. Anadolu ÜniversitesiYayınları, No: 1079, Eskişehir.

Böyük, U., Demir, S. & Erol, M. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretmenlerinin laboratuvarçalışmalarına yönelik yeterlik görüşlerinin farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi, 4, 342-349.

Çepni, S. (2009). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Dördüncü Baskı, Trabzon.

Hill, R. H. (2007). The emergence of laboratory safety. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety,14(3), 14-19.

Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.

Karapantsios, T. D., Boutskou, E. I., Touliopoulou, E. & Mavros, P. (2008). Evaluation of chemical laboratory safety based on student comprehension of chemicals labeling.Education for Chemical Engineers, 3, 66-73.

Kırbaşlar, F. G., Özsoy Güneş, Z. & Derelioğlu, Y. (2010). Investigation of pre-service science teachers’ opinions and knowledge degrees on laboratory safety. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 30(3), 801-818.

Langerman, N. (2009). Laboratory safety?. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 16(3), 49- 50.

Mogopodi, D., Paphane, B. & Petros, S. (2015). Assessment of chemical management practicesand safety in junior secondary school laboratories in Gaborone. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 22(5), 17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2015.01.001

Morgil, İ. ve Yılmaz, A. (2000). Sicheres Arbeiten bei Lehramtsstudenten der Chemie in dereiner Türkischen Univertsitaet. Chemkon, 4, 198-203.

Peplow, M. & Marris, E. (2006). How dangerous is chemistry?. Nature, 441(7093), 560-561.

Semerci, K. (2001). İlköğretim II. kademe fen bilgisi eğitiminde laboratuvar uygulamaları ile ilgili yeterlilikler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Türk, S. (2010). İlköğretim fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin laboratuvar yeterliklerinin belirlenmesi.Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

West, S. S., Westerlund, J. F., Nelson, N. C., Stephenson, A. L. & Nyland, C. K. (2002). What the safety research says to texas science teachers. The Texas Science Teachers, 31, 11 15.

Yılmaz, A. & Morgil, İ. (1999). Kimya öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin laboratuvaruygulamalarında kullandıkları laboratuvarların şimdiki durumu ve güvenli çalışmayailişkin öğrenci görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 104 - 109.

YÖK /Dünya Bankası, (1997). Kimya öğretimi, ss. 14 -15, Ankara.

Additional Files

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

Demircioğlu, H. ., & Demircioğlu , G. . (2017). Determination of Prospective Chemistry Teachers’ Opinions and Information Levels on Laboratory Safety. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 6(2), 61–75. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/276