Impact of Mothers’ and Teachers’ Testimonies and Scientific Explanations on Children’s Judgments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N3.18Keywords:
Mothers’ testimony, teachers’ testimony, children’s judgment, scientific explanation, early childhoodAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of mothers’ and teachers’ testimonies that conflict with scientific facts and scientific explanations on kindergartners’ judgments. The participants consisted of 104 young children in Şanlıurfa province in Turkey. Their ages ranged from 48 to 79 months, with a mean age of 61.48 months (SD = 5.58). The participants were randomly assigned to the following four groups: 1) Scientific explanation followed by teacher’s testimony, 2) teacher’s testimony; 3) scientific explanation followed by mother’s testimony, 4) mother’s testimony. The children responded to a question about a scientific fact. After the response, they watched their mothers’ or teachers’ testimonies which contradict the scientific fact. Findings revealed that when a scientific explanation was not provided, the children tended to show deference to their teachers’ and especially mothers’ testimony. A week later, a follow-up measurement revealed that this impact did not last a week.Downloads
References
Alpaslan, Muhammet Mustafa, Özgür, Ulubey & Rıdvan Ata. “Adaptation of technological pedagogical content knowledge scale into Turkish culture within the scope of 21st century skills”. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10 (2021): 77-91.
Bascandziev, Igor & Paul L. Harris. “The role of testimony in young children’s solution of a gravity-driven invisible displacement task”. Cognitive Development, 25 (2010): 233-246. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.06.002
Brem, Sarah & Lance J. Rips. “Explanation and evidence in informal argument”. Cognitive Science, 24 (4) (2000): 573-604.
Chan, Cheri & Twila Tardiff. “Knowing better: The role of prior knowledge and culture in trust in testimony”. Developmental Psychology, 49 (2013): 591–601.
Chinn, Clark & Willam Brewer. “The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction”. Review of Educational Research, 63 (1) (1993): 1-49.
Clement, Fabrice. “Trust or not to trust? Children’s social epistemology”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1 (2010): 531-549. doi: 10.1007/s13164-010-0022-3
Clement, Fabrice, Melissa A. Koenig & Paul L. Harris. “The ontogenesis of trust”. Mind & Language, 19(4) (2004): 360-379. doi: 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00263.x
Corriveau, Kathleen & Paul L. Harris. “Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information”. Developmental Science, 12 (1) (2009a): 188-193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00763.x
Corriveau, Kathleen & Paul L. Harris. “Choosing your informant: weighing familiarity and recent accuracy”. Developmental Science, 12 (3) (2009b): 426-437 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00792.x
Corriveau, Kathleen, Paul L. Harris, Elizabeht Meins, Charles Fernyhough, Bronia Arnott, Lorna Elliott, Beht Liddle, Alexandra Hearn, & Lucia Vittorini. “Young children’s trust in their mother’s claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy”. Child Development, 80 (3) (2009): 750-761.
Cote, Sylvana, Chantal Mongeau, Christa Japel, Qian Xu, Jean R. Seguin, & Richard E. Tremblay. “Child care quality and cognitive development: Trajectories leading to better preacademic skills”. Child Development, 84 (2) (2013): 752–766.
Croninger, Robert, Jennifer King Rice, Amy Rathbun, & Masako Nishio. “Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement”. Economics of Education Review, 26 (2007): 312–324.
Crowley, Kevin & Robert Siegler. “Explanation and generalization in young children’s strategy learning”. Child Development, 70(2) (1999): 304-316.
Enesco, Ileana, Purificacion Rodríguez, Oliva Lago, Cristina Dopico, & Ana Escudero. “Do teachers’ conflicting testimonies influence children’s decisions about unconventional rules of counting”? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32 (2016): 483-500. doi: 10.1007/s10212-016-0319-4
Guerrero, Silvia, Cristina Cascado, Melisa Sausa, & İleana Enesco. “My teacher is wrong: Preschoolers’ opposition to non-conventional statements”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 39(2) (2017): 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.11.001
Jaswal, Vikram. “Believing what you’re told: Young children’s trust in unexpected testimony about the physical World”. Cognitive Psychology, 61 (2010): 248-272. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.002
Jaswal, Vikram & Ellen Markman. “Looks aren’t everything: 24-month-olds’ willingness to accept unexpected labels”. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8 (1) (2007): 93-111. doi: 10.1080/15248370709336995
Jaswal, Vikram. “Don’t believe everything you hear: Preschoolers’ sensitivity to speaker intent in category induction”. Child Development, 75 (6) (2004): 1871-1885.
Kim, Sunae, Kalish, W. C., & Paul L. Harris. “Speaker reliability guides children’s inductive inferences about novel properties”. Cognitive Development, 27, (2012): 114-125.
Kiuru, Noona, Kaisa Aunola, Minna Torppa, Marja-Kristiina Lerkkanen, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Pekka Niemi, Jaana Viljaranta, Anna-Liisa Lyyra, Esko Leskinen, Asko Tolvanen & Jari-Erik Nurmi. “The role of parenting styles and teacher interactional styles in children’s reading and spelling development”. Journal of School Psychology, 50 (2012): 799–823.
Kotaman, Hüseyin & Ali Kemal Tekin. The impact of religion on the development of young children’s factuality judgments. North American Journal of Psychology, 17(3), (2015): 525-540.
Kotaman, Hüseyin. “Turkish classroom teachers’ views on school readiness: a phenomenological study”. Education 3-13: International, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42 (5) (2014): 542-553. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2012.736401.
Kuzyk, Olivia, Shawna Grossman, & Diane Poulin-Dubois. “Knowing who knows: Metacognitive and causal learning abilities guide infants’ selective social learning”. Developmental Science, (2019): 23:e12904. doi: 10.1111/desc.12904
Legare, Cristine. “Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesies-testing behavior in young children”. Child Development, 83 (1) (2012): 173-185. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x
Legare, Cristine, Henry Wellman. & Susan Gelman. “Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning”. Cognition 58, (2009): 177-194.
Lombrozo, Tania. The structure and function of explanation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (10), (2006): 465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.0
Lopez-Mobilia, Gabriel & Jacqueline Woolley. “Interactions between knowledge and testimony in children’s reality-status judgments”. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17 (3), (2016): 486-504, doi: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1061529.
Luu, Betty, Michael De Rosnay. & Paul Harris. “Five-year-olds are willing, but 4-year-olds refuse, to trust informants who offer new and unfamiliar labels for parts of the body”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, (2013): 234-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.003
Nurmsoo, Erika, & Elizabeth Robinson. “Identifying unreliable informants: do children excuse past inaccuracy”? Developmental Science,12 (1) (2009): 41-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00750.x
Rittle-Johnson, Bethany, Megan Saylor & Kathryn Swygert. “Learning from explaining: Does it matter if mom is listening”? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100 (2008): 215–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.002
Robinson, Edward & Edward Whitcombe. “Children’s suggestibility in relation to their understanding about source of knowledge”. Child Development, 74(1) (2003): 48-62.
Sabbagh, Mark & Dare Baldwin. “Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers’ theory of mind and semantic development”. Child Development, 72 (4) (2001): 1054–1070.
Taylor, Marianne. “Gender influences on children’s selective trust of adult testimony”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(2013): 672-690. doi: org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.04.003
Thornberg, Robert. “It’s not fair!’-Voicing pupils’ criticism of school rules”. Children & Society, 22 (2008) 418–428.
Thornberg, Robert. “Inconsistencies in everyday patterns of school rules”. Ethnography and Education, 2 (3) (2007): 401–416.
Tong, Yu, Fuxing Wang, & Judith Danovitch. “The role of epistemic and social charactristics in children’s selective trust: Three meta-analyses.” Developmental Science, 23 (2) (2019): 1-18. doi: 10.1111/desc.12895
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Psycho-Educational Research Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
