Technology Education in Primary Schools: An Overwiev of Turkey and Scotland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N3.13

Keywords:

Technology, technology education, primary schools, primary education, comperative studies

Abstract

Technology education varies across countries depending on the goals they set to achieve. Therefore, comparative research on different technology education approaches can provide a holistic perspective and contribute to the literature. This paper compared the technology-focused courses offered by primary schools in Turkey and Scotland. A qualitative research design was adopted. Data were collected using document review and analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results pointed to differences in technology policies, manifesting themselves in the curricula of the courses offered by the schools. However, the courses also had something in common in terms of structure, goal, content, and approach to learning and teaching. We discussed the differences and similarities based on literature. In order to reveal different dimensions of technology education, comparative education studies that address different countries can be suggested.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edip Tut

Research Assistant
Primary Education
Ondokuz Mayis University
Turkey
E-mail: ediptut@hotmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0003-2191-6539

Nurbanu Şeren

Research Assistant
Primary Education
Ondokuz Mayis University
Turkey
E-mail: nurbanuseren@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0002-0119-1684

Elif Aydın-Çolak

Teacher
Primary Education
Ondokuz Mayis University
Turkey
Email: eliifaydin@hotmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0003-4195-6730

Kasım Kıroğlu

Professor
Primary Education
Ondokuz Mayis University
Turkey
Email: november@omu.edu.tr
ORCID: 0000-0001-5711-9182

References

Akçay, Ahmet Oğuz. “Instructional Technologies and Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Selection of Technology”. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(7) (2017): 163-173.

Aktay, Sayım, & Güvey Aktay, Emel. “İlkokullarda teknoloji eğitimi”. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(19) (2015): 17-44.

Al-Alwani, Abdulkareem. “Information technology integration in higher education: A novel approach for impact assessment”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(6) (2014): 32-36.

Amankwah, Francis, et. al. “Perception of pre-service teachers’ towards the teaching practice programme in College of Technology Education, University of Education, Winneba”. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4) (2017): 13-20.

Amemado, Dodzi. “Integrating technologies in higher education: the issue of recommended educational features still making headline news”. Open Learning, 29(1) (2014): 15-30.

Andersson, Sven. “Newly qualified teachers’ learning related to their use of information and communication technology: a Swedish perspective”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37 (5) (2006): 665-682.

Ashford-Rowe, et. al. “Emerging educational institutional decision-making matrix”. US-China Education Review. 8(3) (2011): 317–322.

Autio, Ossi. “Pedagogical background for technology education-meaningful learning in theory and practice”. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4) (2009): 14-23.

Autio, Ossi. “Traditional craft or technology education: Development of students’ technical abilities in Finnish comprehensive school”. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1) (2016): 75- 84.

Barlex, David. “Teaching young people about the nature of technology”. PATT. 25 (2011): 66-75.

Başal, Ahmet. “English Language Teachers And Technology Education”. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(4) (2015): 1496-1511.

Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. 21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. U.S.A.: Solution Tree Press, 2010.

Boser, Richard, et. al. “Students’ attitudes toward technology in selected technology education programs”. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1) (1998): 4-19.

Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2) (2009): 27-40.

Budinski, Natalija, & Milinkovic, Dragica. “Transition from realistic to real world problems with the use of technology in elementary mathematical education”. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(1) (2017): 53-62.

Compton, V. J., et. al. Exploring the transformational potential of technological literacy. In Proceedings of the joint 25th pupils attitude toward technology (PATT 25) and 8th centre for research in primary technology (CRIPT 8) conference (pp. 128–136). London: Goldsmiths, 2011.

Çoklar, Ahmet Naci, & Bağcı, Hakkı. “Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi kavramına yönelik geliştirmiş olduğu metaforlar”. Journal of Qafqaz University, 28 (2009): 172-184.

Dakers, John. “Technology education as solo activity or socially constructed learning”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15 (1) (2005): 73-89.

De Vries, M. The developing field of technology education: an introduction. In A. Jones & M. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 2-9). Rotterdam: Sense publishers, 2009.

De Vries, et al. Technology education today: International perspectives. New York: Waxmann, 2016.

Dinç, Emre. “Prospective teachers’ perceptions of barriers to technology integration in education”. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4) (2019): 381-398.

Doğan, M. E. (2012). Bı̇lgı̇nı̇n toplumsallaşması sürecı̇nde teknolojı̇nı̇n kullanımı ve önemı̇: Anadolu Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇ örneğı̇ (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.

Dolenc, Kosta, & Abersek, Boris. “TECH8 intelligent and adaptive e-learning system: Integration into Technology and Science classrooms in lower secondary schools”. Computers & Education, 82(1) (2015): 354-365.

Education Scotland (2020a). The purpose of the Curriculum for Excellence. Retrieved from https://education.gov.scot/education-scotland/scottish-education-system/policy-for-scottish-education/policy-drivers/cfe-building-from-the-statement-appendix-incl-btc1-5/the-purpose-of-the-curriculum/

Education Scotland (2020b). What is Curriculum for Excellence? Retrieved from https://education.gov.scot/education-scotland/scottish-education-system/policy-for-scottish-education/policy-drivers/cfe-building-from-the-statement-appendix-incl-btc1-5/what-is-curriculum-for-excellence/

Education Scotland (2020c). Curriculum for Excellence-Technologies: Principles and Practices. Retrieved from https://education.gov.scot/Documents/technologies-pp.pdf

Erdemir, Naki, et. al. “Öğretmen adaylarının eğitimde teknolojiyi kullanabilme özgüvenlerinin tespiti”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3) (2009): 99-108.

Ergas, H. (1987). The importance of technology policy. In Economic policy and technological performance, 51-96. Eds: Partha Dasgupta, & Paul Stoneman.

Ernst, Jeremy V., & Moye, Johnny J. “Social adjustment of at-risk technology education students”. Journal of Technology Education, 24(2) (2013): 2-13.

Fagerberg, Jan. “Innovation policy: rationales, lessons and challenges”. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31 (2) (2016): 497-512.

Fantz, Todd D., & Katsioloudis, Petros J. “Analysis of engineering content with technology education programs”. Journal of Technology Education, 23(1) (2011): 19-31.

Garmire, E., & Pearson, G. Tech Tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2006.

Gibson, Ken. “Technology and Technological Knowledge: A Challenge for School Curricula”. Teachers and Teaching, 14 (1) (2008): 3-15.

Glowatz, Matt, & O’Brien, Orna. “Academic engagement and technology: Revisiting the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge framework (TPACK) in higher education (HE): The academics’ perspectives”. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5 (2017): 133-159.

Günay, Durmuş. “Teknoloji nedir? Felsefi bir yaklaşım”. Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi. 7(1) (2017): 163-166.

Güngören, Özlem Canan, et. al. “Tablet bilgisayar kabul ölçeği-Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması”. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176) (2014): 69-79.

Gürfidan, Hasan, & Koç, Mustafa. “Okul kültürü, teknoloji liderliği ve destek hizmetlerinin öğretmenlerin teknoloji entegrasyonuna etkisi: bir yapısal eşitlik modellemesi”. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(188) (2016): 99-116.

Haskova, Alena, & Dvorjakova, Silvia. “Analysis of Technology Education Development at Schools in Slovakia”. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 8 (2016): 236-245.

Heddens, J. W., & Speer, W.R. Today’s mathematics: Concepts, methods, and instructional activities. Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.

Hussain, Tariq, et. al. “Attitude towards Entrepreneurship: An Exploration of Technology Education Students”. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(1) (2018): 131-139.

Jablansky, Sophie, et. al. “The development of relational reasoning in primary and secondary school students: a longitudinal investigation in technology education”. International journal of technology and design education, 30 (2019): 1-21.

Jarvinen, Esa Matti, & Rasinen, Aki. “Implementing technology education in Finnish general education schools: studying the cross-curricular theme Human being and technology”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 25(1) (2015): 67-84.

Jimenez, Rodriguez Carmen, et. al. “Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis”. Education Sciences, 9(3) (2019): 169.

Karaağaçlı, Mustafa, & Mahiroğlu, Ahmet. “Yapılandırmacı öğretim açısından teknoloji eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi”. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi, 16, (2005): 47-63.

Köseoğlu, Pınar, et. al. “Bilgisayar kursunun bilgisayara yönelik başarı, tutum ve öz yeterlik inançları üzerine etkisi”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33 (2007): 203-209.

McLain, Matt, et. al. “How technology makes us human: cultural historical roots for design and technology education”. The Curriculum Journal, 30 (4) (2019): 464-483.

McLaren, Susan Valerie. “An international overview of assessment issues in technology education: Disentangling the influences, confusion and complexities”. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(2) (2007).

Merriam, Sharan B. Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (S. Turan, çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi, 2015.

Ministry of National Education (2018). Curriculum for Information Technologies and Software course. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=374

Mondal, S. Importance of Technology in Educatıon.In Educational Issues and Challenges, 78-84. Ed.: Sulagna Chakraborty. New Delhi: Kunal Books, 2021.

Nelson, J. L., Palonsky, S., & McCarthy, M. R. Critical issues in education: Dialogues and dialects. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2010.

Niiranen, Sonja, & Hilmola, Antti. “Female technology education teachers’ experiences of Finnish craft education”. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 21(2) (2016): 41-48.

Ozan, Ceyhun, & Taşgın, Adnan. ” Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi standartlarına yönelik öz yeterliklerinin incelenmesi”. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7 (2) (2017): 236-253.

Öqvist, Anna, & Högström, Per. “Don’t ask me why: Preschool teachers’ knowledge in technology as a determinant of leadership behavior”. Journal of Technology Education, 29 (2) (2018): 4-19.

Özgüç, Canan Sola, & Cavkaytar, Atilla. “Zihin yetersizliği olan ortaokul öğrencilerinin bulunduğu bir sınıfta öğretim etkinliklerinin teknoloji desteği ile geliştirilmesi”. Eğitim ve Bilim. 41(188) (2016): 197-226.

Patton, Michael Quinn. Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. (M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir Çev.) Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2014.

Pavlova, M. (2012). Generic green skills: Can they be addressed through technology education. Griffith University. 7th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research 2012: “Best practice in Technology, Design and Engineering Education”

Pinelli, Thomas E., & Haynie III, James W. “A case for the nationwide ınclusion of engineering in the K-12 curriculum via technology education”. Journal of Technology Education, 21(2) (2010): 52-68.

Rasinen, Aki, et. al. “Technology education for children in primary schools in Finland and Germany: different school systems, similar problems and how to overcome them”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4) (2009): 367-379.

Reinsfield, Elizabeth. “A future-focus for teaching and learning: Technology education in two New Zealand secondary schools”. Teachers and Curriculum, 16(1) (2016): 67-76.

Ritz, J. M. Issues confronting technology education: An international perspective. STEMPS Faculty Publications, 2012.

Seery, Niall, et. al. “Considering the relationship between research and practice in technology education: A perspective on future research endeavours”. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 24(2) (2019): 163-174.

Seferoğlu, Süleyman Sadi, et. al. “İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin ve öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayarların öğrenme/öğretme sürecinde kullanımı ile ilgili görüşleri”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, (2008): 273-283.

Silverman, David. Nitel verileri yorumlama (E. Dinç Çev.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2018.

Snape, Paul. “Enduring learning: Integrating C21st Soft skills through technology education”. Design and Technology Education, 22(3) (2017): 1-13.

Soobik, Mart. “Physical learning environment and its suitability to the objectives of technology education”. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1) (2013): 20-33.

Soobik, Mart. “Teaching methods influencing the sustainability of the teaching process in technology education in general education schools”. Journal Of Teacher Education For Sustainability, 16(1) (2014): 89-101.

Şad, Nihat S., & Arıbaş, Sabahattin. “Bazı gelişmiş ülkelerde teknoloji eğitimi ve Türkiye için öneriler”. Milli Eğitim Dergisi. 40(185) (2010): 278-299.

Şenel, Ahmet, & Gençoğlu, Serhat. “Küreselleşen dünyada teknoloji eğitimi”. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (12) (2003): 45-65.

Şimşek, Ali, et. al. “Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında güncel eğilimler”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 19 (2008): 439-458.

Tu, Tsunghui. “Preschool science environment: What is available in a preschool classroom?” Early Childhood Education Journal, 33 (4) (2006): 245-251.

Türkoğlu, Adil. Karşılaştırmalı eğitim nedir? In Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yansımaları (s. 1-22). Ed.: S. Aynal. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2012.

Uça Güneş, Pınar. “Toplumsal değişim, teknoloji ve eğitim ilişkisinde sosyal ağların yeri”. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (2) (2016): 191-206.

Vocational Qualifications Institution (2020). Türkiye yeterlilikler çerçevesinin uygulanmasına ilişkin usul ve esaslar hakkında yönetmelik. Retrieved from https://www.myk.gov.tr/index.php/tr/turkiye-yeterlilikler-cercevesi

Volk, K. S. Attitudes. M. de Vries, R. Custer, J. Dakers ve G. Martin (Ed.). In Analyzing best practices in technology education (s. 191-202). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2007.

Wicklein, Robert, et. al. “Essential concepts of engineering design curriculum in secondary technology education”. Journal of Technology Education, 20 (2) (2009): 65-80.

Yalçın, Haydar, & Yayla, Kemal. “Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi konusunda yapılan araştırmaların bilimetrik analizi ve bilimsel iletişim”. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41 (188) (2016): 291-307.

Yıldırım, Ali, & Şimşek, Hasan. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi, 2018.

Yılmaz, Muamber. “Sınıf öğretmeni yetiştirmede teknoloji eğitimi”. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 27(1) (2007): 155-167.

Additional Files

Published

2021-12-10

How to Cite

Tut, E. ., Şeren, N. ., Aydın-Çolak, E. ., & Kıroğlu, K. . (2021). Technology Education in Primary Schools: An Overwiev of Turkey and Scotland. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(3), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N3.13