Leaky pipeline: Women Lost in the Academic System, Evidence from Turkey

Authors

  • K. Funda Nayir Cankiri Karatekin University
  • P.Oya Taneri Cankiri Karatekin University

Keywords:

Female academicians, Leaky Pipeline, Women in Management, Gender Inequality

Abstract

Gender inequalities that exist in a society have an important role to hinder women to utilize their educational rights because they impinge on education. Though education system founded on equality principle, there are confidential messages about women and men are not equal. This kind of messages negatively affects women to take part senior-levels in the academic system. Leaky pipeline metaphor, is described as keeping out of women in the hierarchy of academic system, is specially used for women on their academic career trajectories (Women and Men in Higher Education, 2008).The purpose of this research is to make clear the main factors that prevent female academicians to undertake managerial tasks in Turkey. Qualitative research approach was used in this study. The data were collected using a semi-structured interview consisting of open-ended questions. The participants of this study were five volunteer female-academicians from social sciences departments such as philosophy, sociology, history, geography and educational sciences from Cankiri Karatekin University. The collected data were analysed by using content analysis.According to the anticipated findings of this study are those; there are some indistinguishable factors that prevent the assignment of female-academicians to the managerial tasks such as the roles of women in the society, gender inequalities, and childrearing methods of families. Women are rarely included in the managerial tasks since the norms and values of Turkish society require and demand women to dedicate themselves to their family and children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alper, J. (1993).The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science, 260, 409–411.

Bacak, B. (2010). Discrimination between men and women in the working life in turkey and regulations about positive discrimination, The Social Science, 5 (2), 164 - 171

Barinaga, M. (1992). The pipeline is leaking. Science, 255(15), 1366-1367.

Blau, F.D. (1999). Women’s economic well-being, 1970–1995: Indicators and trends, Focus, 20 (1), 4 – 10.

Braddock, D. (1994). The Glass Ceiling and Persons with Disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Glass Ceiling Commission.

Brown, M. (1996). Barriers to women managers’ advancement in education in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(6), 18-23

Coleman, M. (1994). Women in educational management, the principals of educational management.(Eds). Bush, T & Burnham, J.W., London: Longman

Constitution of Turkish Republic (1982). (Retrieved on February, 28, 2014 from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/2709_0.html

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. (1979). (Retrieved on February, 28, 2014 from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cedaw.pdf

Çelikten, M. (2004). Okul müdürü koltuğundaki kadınlar: Kayseri ili örneği. [Women at the school principal seat: Example of Kayseri province] Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17, 91-118.

Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations. (1993). Report of the Governor's Task Force on the Glass Ceiling Commission. Madison, Wisconsin: State of Wisconsin.

Elborgh-Woytek, K., Newiak, M., Kochhar, K., Fabrizio, S., Kpodar, K., Wingender, P., Clements, B., & Schwartz, G. (2013). Women, work, and the economy: Macroeconomic gains from gender equity. Report of International Monetary Fund. Strategy, Policy, and Review Department and Fiscal Affairs Department.

Frail, C.D. (2012). Keeping more women in the leadership pipeline Drivers, facilitators and enablers to women’s advancement. Master of Arts in Leadership. The University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Franks, K., Schurink, W., & Fourie, L. (2006). Exploring the social construction of life roles of career-oriented women.South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32(1), 17– 24.

Gerni, M. (2001). Yönetimde Kadınlar. [Women in management] İstanbul: Beta Basım.

Gold, A. (1996). (Women and) Educational Management, Gender Equalty for 2000 and Beyond Conference, Ireland.

Göğüş Tan, M. (2011). Eğitim, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Sosyolojisi [Education, Sociology of Gender] (Ed. Ecevit, Y. & Karkıner, N). Anadolu University Publication. No: 2307.

Jonung, C. & Persson, I. (1993). Women and market work: The misleading tale of participation rates in international comparisons. Work, Employment, and Society, 7, 259–74.

Karcıoğlu, F. & Leblebici, Y. (2014). Kadın yöneticilerde kariyer engelleri: Cam tavan sendromu üzerine bir uygulama. [The career barriers of female administrators: A practice on glass-ceiling syndrome]. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28 (4),1- 20.

Knight Higher Education Collaborative. (2001). Gender intelligence. Policy Perspectives, 10 (2).

Korn/Ferry International. (1993). Decade of the executive woman. New York: Korn/Ferry International Federal Glass Ceiling Commission.

Leeman, R. J., Boes, S. & Rin, S. D. (2009). The leaky pipeline in Switzerland: What is causing women to drop out of academic research and careers at senior levels? Inequalities in Higher Education and Research, 2nd International RESUP Conference, Lausanne, 18th -20th of June, 2009.

MoNE (1973). Basic Law of National Education 1739, Resmi Gazete, Yayım Tarihi, 24.6.1973, Sayı: 14574.

Mostert, K. (2009). The balance between work and home: The relationship between work and home demands and ill health of employed females. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), Art.#743, 8 pages.http://dx.doi.org/sajip.v35i1.743

OECD. (1991). Absence from Work Reported in Labour Force Surveys, Employment Outlook . Paris: OECD, pp. 177–98.

Phillips, J. D., & Reisman, B. (1992). Turnover and return on investment models for family leave. In D. E. Friedman, E. Galinsky & V. Plowden (Eds.) Parental leave and productivity: Current research: 33-53. New York: Families and Work Institute.

Polkowska, D. (2013). Women scientists in the leaking pipeline: Barriers to the commercialization of scientific knowledge by women, J. Technology Management Innovation, 8 (2), 156 – 165).

Ragins, B. R. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005),12 (1), 28-42.

Ryon, J., Pollock, K. & Antonelli, F. (2009). Teacher diversity in Canada: Leaky pipelines, bottlenecks, and glass ceilings, Canadian Journal of Education 32, 3, 591‐617

Sherman, A. (2000). Women managing/managing women: The marginalization of female leadership in rural school settings. Educational Management and Administration. 28, 133 – 143.

Sultana, A. (2011). Patriarchy and women’s subordination: A theoretical analysis. The Arts Faculty Journal, 4, 1-18.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), (Retrieved 28.02.2014; http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/)

United Nations. (2010). The world's women. Trends and statistics. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Van den Berg, H.S., & Van Zyl, E.S. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of the stress experienced by high-level career women. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34, (3), 17–21.

Williams, W M., & Ceci, S. J., (2012). When scientists choose motherhood. American Scientist. 100, 138–146.

Women and Men in Higher Education (2008). (Retrieved from 28.02.2014; http://www.hsv.se/download/18.7d96afab11f40c928617ffe30/0848R.pdf).

www.goethe.de/ins/uy/prj/jug/.../3_int_girls.pdf Retrieved in 30.03.2014.

Additional Files

Published

2015-04-01

How to Cite

Nayir, K. F. ., & Taneri, P. (2015). Leaky pipeline: Women Lost in the Academic System, Evidence from Turkey. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 4(1), 16–23. Retrieved from https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/335