An Investigation of Variables Predicting the Reading Literacy in Pisa 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V12.N1.21Keywords:
Reading Literacy, PISA 2018, Hierarchical Linear Modelling, Parents’ Emotional Support, AttitudeAbstract
This study aims to determine variables predicting students’ reading literacy in the PISA application. Turkey’s PISA 2018 sample data that consisted of 186 schools and 6890, representing 12 regions from Turkey were analyzed by conducting a two-level hierarchical linear modeling to examine students’ reading literacy at the student and school levels. The results indicated that, according to the student-level predictors, female students had higher reading literacy and the reading literacy was positively influenced by an increase in predictors of father’s education level, predictors showing metacognition levels, socioeconomic levels, parents’ emotional support to the students, reading pleasure levels, and reading attitudes. Considering the school-level predictors, deficiencies in educational materials and student behaviors hindering learning reduced achievement, whereas teacher behaviors hindering learning had a positive effect on achievement. Offering extracurricular creative activities in the school environment reduced the negative impact of the educational status of the mother to a certain extent. The sub-dimension of the metacognitive level assessment had an increased impact on reading literacy, but student behaviors hindering learning had a negative effect on it. Considering the findings, the reasons for the low level of reading literacy of students and how it can be increased were discussed.
Downloads
References
Akar, F., & Nayir, K. F. (2015). Eğitim kurumlarındaki sosyal kulüplerin etkililiğinin incelenmesi: Uygulamada değişim ihtiyacı. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 5(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2015.009
Anıl, D. (2009). Uluslararası öğrenci başarılarını değerlendirme programı (PISA)’nda Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin fen bilimleri başarılarını etkileyen faktörler. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(52), 87-100.
Arıcı, Ö. (2019). Investigating the factors related to Turkish students' collaborative problem solving skills with mediating models according to PISA 2015 results. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ankara]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center, Turkey.
Arıcı, Ö., & Altıntaş, Ö. (2014). PISA 2009 okuma becerileri yeterliklerinin sosyoekonomik alt yapı ve okul öncesi eğitime katılım açısından incelenmesi: Türkiye Örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(1), 423-448.
Avşar, A. S., & Yalçın, S. (2015). Determining the parental variables that explain students’ reading success by using chaid analysis. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(179), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.2890
Batyra, A. (2017). Türkiye’de cinsiyete dayalı başarı farkı. Aydın Doğan Vakfı ve Eğitim Reformu Girişimi Raporu. Retrieved from http://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/yayin/turkiyede-cinsiyete-dayali-basari-farki-pisa-arastirmasi-bulgulari
Berberoğlu, G., Çalışkan, M., & Karslı, N. (2019). Variables predicting PISA scientific literacy scores in Turkey. International Journal of Science and Education, 2(2), 38-49.
Bindak, R. (2018). Lojistik regresyon analizi ile pisa araştırmasında öğrenci başarısının modellenmesi. Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 14(28), 57‒74. Doi: 10.26650/ekoist.2018.14.28.0010
Erdoğan, E. (2018). Uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme programında öğrencilerin sosyoekonomik özellikleri ile okuma becerileri arasındaki ilişki. [Master’s Thesis, Trakya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center, Turkey.
Ertem, H. (2021). Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.14.8.1
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
Gülleroğlu, H. D., Bilican Demir, S., & Demirtaşlı, N. (2014). Türk öğrencilerinin PISA 2003-2006-2009 dönemlerindeki okuma becerilerini yordayan sosyoekonomik ve kültürel yordayıcıların araştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(2), 201-222.
Gürsakal, S. (2012). PISA 2009 öğrenci başarı düzeylerini etkileyen faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 441-452.
Güzle Kayır, Ç. (2012). PISA 2009-Türkiye verilerine dayanarak okuma becerileri alanında başarılı okullar ile başarısız okulları ayırt eden okul içi etmenler ve sosyo ekonomik faktörler. [Master’s Thesis, Akdeniz University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center, Turkey.
Hauser, R. M., Edley, C. F., Koenig, J. A., & Elliott, S. W. (2005). Measuring literacy: Performance levels for adults. National Academies Press.
Hattie, J. (2009) Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. Routledge.
Hinck, S. S., & Brandell, M. E. (1999). Service learning: Facilitating academic learning and character development. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 83, 16-25.
Kasapoğlu, K. (2009). A logistic regression analysis of Turkey’s fifteen-year-olds’ scoring above the OECD average on the PISA’09 reading assessment. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 649–667.
Koyuncu, İ., & Fırat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189
Lemke, M., Sen, A., Johnston, J.S., Pahlke, E., Williams, T., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2005). Characteristics of U.S. 15-year-old low ahievers in an international context: Findings from PISA 2000 (NCES 2006-010). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Government Printing Office.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., & Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 21(1–2), 19–70.
Magnuson, K. (2007). Maternal education and children's academic achievement during middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1497-1512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1497
MoNE (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. Retrieved from https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/03105347_PISA_2018_Turkiye_On_Raporu.pdf
Mutluer, C., & Büyükkıdık, S. (2017). PISA 2012 verilerine göre matematik okuryazarlığının lojistik regresyon ile kestirilmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 46(46), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.273926
Naftali, O. (2010). Recovering childhood: Play, pedagogy, and the rise of psychological knowledge in contemporary urban China. Modern China, 36(6) 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700410377594
OECD (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en
OECD (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
OECD (2017). Table III.9.18 – parents who give their child emotional support: Result based on students' self-reports, in PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students' Well-Being, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-table158-en
OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework_5c07e4f1-en#page7
OECD (2020). Turkey - OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_TUR.pdf
OECD (2021). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Meier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383
PISA (2015). Ulusal nihai rapor. https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr
Quinn, B., & Jadav, A. D. (1987). Causal relationship between attitude and achievement for elementary grade mathematics and reading. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 366–372.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods. (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.
Savran, Z. N. (2004). PISA projesi’nin Türk eğitim sistemi açısından incelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 397-412.
Schnabel, K., Alfed, C., Eccles, J., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2002). Parental influence on students’ educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications – same effect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1863
Shera, P. (2014). School effects, gender and socioeconomic differences in reading performance: A multilevel analysis. International Education Studies, 7(11), 28-39. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p28
Tavşancıl, E., Yıldırım, O., & Bilican-Demir, S. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of learning strategies and reading enjoyment on PISA 2009 reading performance. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 82, 169-189.
Theis, D., Sauerwein, M., & Fischer, N. (2020). Perceived quality of instruction: the relationship among indicators of students’ basic needs, mastery goals, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12313
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81-101. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
Urfalı Dadandı, P., Dadandı, G., & Koca, F. (2018). PISA 2015 Türkiye sonuçlarına göre sosyoekonomik faktörler ile okuma becerileri arasındaki ilişkiler. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 1239-1252.
Üstün, U., Özdemir, E., Cansız, M., & Cansız, N. (2020). Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin fen okuryazarlığını etkileyen faktörler nelerdir? PISA 2015 verisine dayalı bir hiyerarşik doğrusal modelleme çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(3), 720-732. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019050786
Walker, J. M., Shenker, S. S., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (2010). Why do parents become involved in their children's education? Implications for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 14(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1001400104
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.
Yıldırım, Ö. (2012). Okuduğunu anlama başarısıyla ilişkili faktörlerin aşamalı doğrusal modellemeyle belirlenmesi (PISA 2009 Hollanda, Kore ve Türkiye karşılaştırması). [Doctoral Dissertation, Ankara University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center, Turkey.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Psycho-Educational Research Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
